Infrastructure Damage by Longer Combination Vehicles
Damage to Bridges
According to the USDOT, bridge costs would
skyrocket if LCVs were allowed nationwide, adding $319 billion in
bridge costs ($53 billion in capital and $266 billion in user delay
costs). Bridges are designed with a safety margin of error to ensure
against bridge failure. LCVs would overstress some bridges, especially
older ones, increasing the number of bridges that must be replaced,
strengthened, or posted.
Bridge damage is determined by examining axle weight and spacing. A
truck whose axles are close together will cause more bridge damage than
a truck whose axles are spaced farther apart. A useful analogy is to
think of a person standing on an icy lake. The person is more likely to
fall through the ice while standing because weight is concentrated on
one spot; but laying down spreads the weight, making it less likely the
ice will crack.
Source: Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Study, USDOT
Pavement Damage
Nationwide operation of LCVs could cause an additional $1.4 billion per year in pavement damage. Although the USDOT Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Study
found that there could be modest pavement cost savings ($398 million, a
0.2% decrease in pavement costs) from allowing certain LCV operation
scenarios, it underestimated the amount of freight that would be
diverted from rail to truck and it greatly overestimated the amount of
freight that would shift from Single-Trailer trucks to LCVs. When these
faulty assumptions are corrected, it is clear that pavement costs would
increase with expanded operation of LCVs.
Source: Analysis of FHWA computer model by Roger Mingo, RD Mingo & Associates
Back to Top
- Infrastructure Damage by Heavier Single-Trailer Trucks
Damage to Bridges
Heavier single-trailer trucks would cause more bridge damage. Bridges
are designed with a safety margin of error to ensure against bridge
failure. Bigger trucks erode that margin of error, increasing the
number of bridges that must be replaced, strengthened, or posted.
Adding axles does not fix this problem. In its NAFTA Scenario, the
USDOT calculated additional bridge costs of $329 billion ($65 billion
in capital and $264 billion in user delay costs). Six-axle,
97,000-pound singles would cause a significant portion of that damage.
Bridge damage is determined by examining axle weight and spacing. A
truck whose axles are close together will cause more bridge damage than
a truck whose axles are spaced farther apart. A useful analogy is to
think of a person standing on an icy lake. The person is more likely to
fall through the ice while standing because weight is concentrated on
one spot; but laying down spreads the weight, making it less likely the
ice will crack
Source: Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Study, USDOT
Pavement Damage
Heavier Single-Trailer trucks would
result in a significant amount of pavement damage. Pavement damage
increases exponentially with the weight of a truck. For example, one
80,000-pound five-axle truck does the same road damage as 9,600
automobiles and five-axle trucks operate well above 80,000 pounds in a
number of states. A 100,000-pound five-axle truck does as much damage
as more than 27,000 automobiles.
Proponents of bigger trucks argue that adding axles to heavier
singles would ameliorate pavement damage. That is not true, however, if
those axles are “lift axles.” (link to FAQs) Adding axles to ameliorate
pavement damage makes trucks harder to turn but lifting the extra
axle(s) eliminates that difficulty. If the life axle is too high,
however, the truck is overloaded. Studies of lift axle use as well as
anecdotal evidence from truck enforcement officers show that lift axles
are often improperly used, either purposefully or due to poor
maintenance. There is also evidence that tridem axles (link to FAQ),
which would be used on six-axle tractor-trailers, cause damage to
pavement subsurfaces and slabs that most studies do not consider.
Sources: Pavement damage
calculations are based on the American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO); Louisiana DOT Study, 1999.
Back to Top